Family Files Federal Civil Rights Lawsuit Over Fatal Deputy Shooting in Riverside

The family of Jaque Rabon, a 23-year-old man who was fatally shot by San Bernardino County sheriff’s deputies in Riverside earlier this year, has filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the sheriff’s department. The lawsuit alleges that deputies used excessive force when they opened fire on Rabon, who was unarmed at the time of the shooting.

This legal action marks a significant development in the ongoing scrutiny of law enforcement use of force, particularly in cases involving unarmed individuals. The family and their attorney publicly announced the lawsuit outside the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, calling for full accountability and transparency regarding the circumstances of Rabon’s death.

Key Takeaways

• The lawsuit alleges deputies used excessive force in shooting Jaque Rabon 20 times despite him being unarmed.
• Deputies responded to a 911 call and attempted to arrest Rabon based on a no-bail warrant related to robbery and assault.
• Critical incident video shows deputies ordered Rabon to show his hands before shooting, but no weapon was found on him.

Background of the Fatal Deputy-Involved Shooting

On January 22, 2026, San Bernardino County sheriff’s deputies located Jaque Rabon in a Riverside shopping center parking lot. Deputies were acting on information from a 911 caller who claimed Rabon had threatened them and was possibly armed. Additionally, Rabon had an outstanding no-bail warrant connected to robbery and assault charges, prompting deployment of a specialized team to arrest him.

Body-worn camera footage released by the sheriff’s department shows deputies ordering Rabon to raise his hands. Rabon fled on foot, with deputies pursuing him through the parking lot. Shortly after the chase began, deputies fired multiple rounds, with the shooting continuing until a command to cease fire was heard. Rabon was struck approximately 20 times.

Details of the Lawsuit and Disputed Use of Force

The lawsuit filed by Rabon’s family alleges that deputies used excessive and unjustified force in shooting an unarmed man. According to the complaint, Rabon was reaching toward a bag during the foot pursuit, but no weapon was found on him. The family’s attorney questioned the justification for deadly force based solely on Rabon reaching into a bag, noting that many people carry bags in public spaces without posing a threat.

The sheriff’s department has referred to its previously released critical incident video and stated that the California Department of Justice has taken over the investigation. The department emphasized its cooperation with the DOJ, which includes providing all evidence and video footage. The investigation remains ongoing.

Legal Issues Surrounding Excessive Force and Accountability

This case highlights the complex legal issues involved in deputy-involved shootings, particularly the standards governing the use of deadly force by law enforcement. Central to the lawsuit is whether deputies reasonably perceived an imminent threat justifying the shooting, especially given that Rabon was unarmed and no weapon was recovered.

The case raises questions about the application of constitutional protections against excessive force under federal civil rights law. It also underscores the challenges in evaluating law enforcement conduct where video evidence, witness accounts, and officer statements may conflict.

From a litigation perspective, issues such as evidence preservation—including body camera footage—and the role of independent investigations by state authorities are critical. The lawsuit also touches on broader concerns about police accountability and the standards to which officers are held compared to civilians.

Why This Case Matters for Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Claims

The Rabon lawsuit is significant because it involves allegations of excessive force resulting in wrongful death, a matter of profound public interest and legal complexity. Cases involving fatal law enforcement encounters often require careful analysis of multiple responsible parties, including individual deputies and the employing agency.

For California injury claims, this case illustrates how federal civil rights claims intersect with state wrongful death actions. It also demonstrates the importance of timely evidence collection and the challenges families face in seeking transparency and accountability from public entities.

Golden Coast Trial Attorneys recognize that wrongful death claims involving law enforcement can involve disputed liability, complex procedural hurdles, and sensitive damages issues such as loss of companionship and support. Understanding the specific facts and legal standards in each case is essential for effective representation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a federal civil rights lawsuit allege in cases like this?

It alleges that law enforcement officers violated the plaintiff’s constitutional rights, such as protection against excessive force, leading to injury or death.

How does the use of body camera footage affect these cases?

Body camera footage can provide critical evidence about the events leading to the use of force, helping to clarify disputed facts.

What standards govern the use of deadly force by deputies in California?

Deadly force is generally justified only when officers reasonably believe there is an imminent threat of death or serious injury to themselves or others.

Can families pursue wrongful death claims alongside federal civil rights lawsuits?

Yes, families often file wrongful death claims under state law in addition to federal civil rights actions to seek damages for their loss.

If you or a loved one has been affected by a serious injury or wrongful death involving law enforcement, consulting experienced Los Angeles County personal injury attorneys can help you understand your rights and options. Contact Golden Coast Trial Attorneys for a free case review.

Original reporting by KTLA: San Bernardino deputies excessive force lawsuit.